The Swiss 1% THC limitation and its impact

Switzerland's 1 percent limitation on THC means it has a higher threshold than the rest of Europe, Canada, and the USA.  Anything around 1 percent THC is understood to be lawful fiber hemp under Swiss Federation law.  Because Switzerland is not a member of the European Union, it's free to set its own marijuana policies.

They rejected the legislation that was approved by the lower chamber of parliament the year earlier.  Faced with the stark choice of legal cannabis or membership at the U.N., Swiss politicians chose the latter.  So now it is up to the National Council again.
It did not help that neighbors France and Germany had begun to loudly complain about the increasing amounts of cannabis coming across their boundaries.  The bud was coming from, you guessed it, Switzerland

The Ministry of Health rejected requests until today, maintaining there is no legal basis for dividing such exceptions from the Narcotics Act.  After rejecting the idea, the Ministry pointed out that the Narcotics Act has to be amended by an"experiment paragraph"  This would provide for the Town of Bern to review prospective programs. Together with the first CBD bars opening, cannabis is now hot news in Switzerland and has become a part of the streetscape and civilization.

 The City of Bern had previously asked a cannabis pilot job many times.  Under the proposed trial, thousands of individuals who use cannabis would be permitted to buy it legally.The pilot project, which would enable cannabis purchases in pharmacies, could be clinically evaluated and serve as a foundation for future cannabis policies.
It's the lower chamber of parliament, analogous to the U.S. House of Representatives.   Together, the two chambers constitute the Swiss Federal Assembly, which meets in Bern. A politician , who favors the legalization of cannabis, will take the lead from the Swiss diplomacy after the withdrawal of political life from his predecessor.

CBD usage is so prevalent, the authorities in Zurich have begun using a quick test device to check for CBD to differentiate between low-THC legal cannabis and the high-THC illegal blossom.

The Council of States even declared a legalization law in 2001.   However, Switzerland, despite its famed neutrality (and, at the moment, non-membership), came under heavy pressure from the United Nations.  The U.N. was unfortunately locked in is quixotic Drug War mindset.  It demanded that Switzerland adhere to its commitment to the 1961 Single Convention.  That worldwide agreement, seen through by the notorious American drug warrior Harry J. Anslinger, essentially forced every country in the world to guarantee to keep cannabis illegal indefinitely. The Council called for an experimental article in the Swiss Federation's Narcotics Act that will permit for scientific research projects such as trials of a"coffee shop" method of cannabis supply like that of Amsterdam.  Five Korean cities have already called for such coffeeshop pilot applications.

A picture taken on September 20, 2017, reveals new Swiss Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis grinning during a press conference following his election by the Federal Assembly in Bern.

Switzerland almost legalized cannabis 20 years back.
Possession of 10 grams or less of cannabis was decriminalized.   Possession of up to 10 g is not punished in most cantons.  A network of"Hanflädelis" (Hemp stores ) and CBD cannabis wholesale quickly popped up where flowers and hash can be purchased at reasonable prices.  The stores first appeared in Zurich, and afterwards throughout the nation.

A nationwide referendum on cannabis legalization failed at the polls in 2008.  In the decade since, the Swiss cities of Bern, Geneva, Basel, and Zurich have repeatedly requested for regulated marijuana sales, beginning with pilot projects.  Many smaller towns also wish to get involved in such trials.

Cannabis activists in Switzerland found a loophole in the Narcotics Act.  The legal gap made it feasible to grow and sell marijuana, both for private use and on a bigger scale.  That is because the law did not yet differentiate between cannabis and hemp on the grounds of THC content.  Provided that the goods were grown and sold for the stated use of"aromatherapy," that made them valid.

I BUILT MY SITE FOR FREE USING